Two is better than none, don't you think so? When the fate of 21 hostages are in the hands of Talibans, to bring home two hostages alive is a big achievement. What is going to happen to the other 19 hostages? The world's message to the Talibans is clear. We do not want only 2 living hostages. We want
ALL of them back... alive!
I was told by my Korean friend, there's a rising resentment towards the United States, particularly towards George Bush and his military for their
"spectator's role" in the entire hostage saga. The South Korea and Afghanistan governments are cracking their skulls in a bid to secure the freedom of the hostages. Why wouldn't anyone be mad, being left on their own after they risked their own life and pledged their support in this
"War against Terror"?
Alright, I do not live in these countries so let's not go there. I shall talk about Singapore then, the very same country that I am living in. Singapore is heavily dependent on United States not just for economic benefits but also for several factors like military support. If you do not know this open secret, can you tell me which cave have you been living in?
I just hate it when we have to boot-lick the United States government. I actually ran out of graceful words in my little limited vocabulary to describe the relationship between Singapore and United States. I see this South Korean hostage crisis as a very big lesson for any alliance with the United States movement. Through this crisis, we have seen how the United States have resumed themselves to mere spectators instead of taking a more proactive approach in this war which stems from their propoganda, despite SOS calls from the South Korean and Afghanistan governments.
I longed for an answer, why is United States not helping more than they have? The answer was pretty clear cut this morning, they were too busy with
Operation Phantom Strike in Iraq to flush out more extremists linked to Al-Qaeda and Iran. OOOOhhhh I seeeeeee... now that explained why United States are
"too busy" to bother about anything else?
It's just painting a very sad picture of how this entire coalition is falling apart. For me, I read it from a very commoner's point of view.
"Fight against terrorists, with me you will. Trouble ashore, without me you shalt." Whatever is happening to the
"support" for United States?
Perhaps, this would be a wake-up call to Singapore... should we continue boot-licking the US government? To what I can recall, George Bush is the only President whom has commanded the tightest ever security coverage on our land than any of our expensive ministers. Never in the recent decade of Singapore's history have I ever seen that amount of security personnel ever deployed for just one man. What do we gain out of it?
Will Singapore come upon a day when we have a crisis and United States is nowhere to be found? Possibly! Isn't South Korea the best living example now? Who is there to help them except themselves? Is Singapore learning the painful lesson South Korea is going through now? Or are we going to continue satisfying our own illusions that building a good relationship with United States is the best solution we can think of? What is the price that South Korea is paying now in their support for the war? Can Singapore even afford this kind of price tag? Through the Yishun MRT's video incident, I think my last question has already been answered.
If anyone is smart enough, one would think twice about supporting US wars ever again. Is Singapore smart enough to pick up the tabs? I don't know... I hope they are. I hope Singapore would never have to live through this. If Singapore does have to face this situation, the country only has itself to blame for licking the wrong boots. Don't blame United States that no help was given, because we should have seen it coming through this South Korean's crisis.
Let's hope the remaining 19 hostages can be released soon. The anguish and anxiety of their families must be so overwhelming. It's hard to imagine...